Community Engagement through Urban Forest Inventories

By 2020, the Mississippi-Alabama Gulf Coast population is projected to increase by 75% to 1.3 million residents. This rate of urbanization impacts urban forest ecosystems which in turn influence local resilience regarding, e.g., thermal comfort, energy use, air quality, carbon storage, wildlife habitat, health benefits, property values, and commercial benefits. Urban forests also act as natural storm buffers by reducing wind speeds, improving water quality, and intercepting the flow of precipitation reaching the ground.

This research and outreach project addresses four related issues: (1) there is a need for urban ecosystem management along the Mississippi-Alabama Gulf Coast; (2) urban ecosystem management is critical to community resiliency; (3) tree canopy data is a baseline for informed ecosystem management; and (4) sustainable urban ecosystem management requires resident engagement.

To this end, we identified resident needs and concerns about urban trees and storm mitigation from key informant interviews and a mail survey across the study area. Using the survey information, we then implemented four bottom-up, volunteer-based urban tree inventories. Inventory projects included several trainings and public workshops for which we gathered evaluation data. Research results indicate important concerns regarding tree hazards, homeowners insurance, and sustainable urban tree management. Despite these concerns, pre- and post-evaluations demonstrate a significant increase in knowledge and positive attitudes about trees, urban forest management, and level of self-efficacy regarding participants’ ability to contribute to community forest well-being.

Period: 2014-2015

The Value of Open Space as a Waterfront Use: a Mixed Methods Study on the Gulf Coast

This paper examines the extent to which Gulf Coast communities value waterfront green space preservation versus developing waterfront open space. Urban green space near waterfront areas includes socially valued landscapes such as scenic sites, wilderness areas, historic and cultural resources, recreation areas, rivers, lakes, estuaries, and salt marshes. Green space provides a wide variety of goods and services including aesthetics, wildlife habitat, recreational opportunities, urban heat island reduction, air quality improvements, stormwater runoff amelioration, energy use reductions, exercise opportunities, a place to relax, and increased real estate values. Many wetlands along the Gulf Coast offer prime examples of how continued degradation of green space increases socioeconomic and biophysical vulnerabilities at local and regional scales. Nevertheless, green space policy-making is complicated by local governments’ dependence on property taxes for operating revenue as well as increasingly limited municipal budgets which exacerbate opportunity costs.

Despite these challenges, it is critical to consider the benefits of green space when evaluating waterfront uses, particularly in places characterized by increasingly land consumptive development patterns such as those along the Gulf Coast. The overall goal of this research is to assist coastal communities in making informed decisions about waterfront planning and management towards increased social and ecological resilience.

We used a mixed methods, multi-disciplinary approach to generate an in-depth understanding of how communities value and use waterfront spaces. Facilitated group discussions are conducted to generate insights about emerging phenomena and obtain contextual information (including environmental and social inequities). In addition, we incorporate these findings into a general population mail survey to determine tradeoffs among alternative waterfront uses and development scenarios. Finally, a revealed preference model was employed using market transaction data.

Findings expand on notions about community attitudes and values towards public goods and the local actions needed to efficiently manage those goods to improve social-ecological adaptations. Results point to the need for public intervention to address market failures, including public acquisition of land, regulatory approaches, and incentive-based approaches. Implications for planning and policy are considered in addition to recommendations for outreach education.

Period: 2014-2016

Volunteer-based Urban Forest Inventories

This project encompasses three related issues: (1) a critical need for urban ecosystem management in Mississippi; (2) tree canopy data is a baseline for informed ecosystem management; and (3) sustainable urban ecosystem management requires resident engagement. Our multidisciplinary project team will work with arboriculture professionals and communities to teach residents  and Extension agents to conduct urban forest canopy inventories using I-Tree Eco software. Residents will improve their knowledge and skills regarding ecosystem management and strengthen community social activeness. Data will be used to further local efforts in urban planning and grant writing. This project pilots a new educational program for the MSU Extension Service, reaches urban clientele, and expands program offerings to include civic ecology/community forestry.

Deliverables: (1) The project will create interest in tree canopy inventories by other communities as measured by number of information requests received by project personnel; (2) 2 in-service trainings for North Mississippi and South Mississippi; (3) at least 8 municipalities (two in each Extension district) complete tree inventories; (4) at least 3 Extension publications

Period: 2013-2015

About

Jason S. Gordon
Assistant Extension Professor
Department of Forestry
Mississippi State University
Box 9681 Thompson Hall
Mississippi State, MS 39762
Phone: (662) 325-8851
Fax: (662) 325-0027
jg966@msstate.edu

Position: Statewide Urban and Community Forestry Extension Specialist
Responsibilities: Extension education, outreach, and research
Education: PhD, The Pennsylvania State University, Natural Resource Sociology
B.S., University of Georgia, Forestry
Affiliations: Society of American Foresters, International Society of Arboriculture (SO6848A), International Association for Society and Natural Resources

Name This Tree

This is not an invasive species, although it originates from East Asia where it is known as “tea flower” and several species are used in the cultivation of tea leaves for beverage. The plant is evergreen, relatively short with a bushy shape, and has brightly colored flowers during the winter. Like other calcifuges known for their flowers, it prefers acidic soils. This is the state flower of Alabama. Do you know what tree this is?

 

 

An urban forest can help businesses prosper, residents stay healthy, speaker says

Source: AMY WOLD awold@theadvocate.com January 18, 2015

The benefits of an urban Forest go beyond water and air quality. A good tree coverage and other landscaping can serve as an economic benefit and make people more willing to spend more in a business district, said Kathleen Wolf, University of Washington College of the Environment research scientist.

“Trees are more than being pretty. It’s more than just aesthetics,” she said.

Speaking at Baton Rouge Green’s Arbor Day luncheon at LSU on Friday, Wolf talked about the many social aspects of urban forestry.

“The work I bring to all this is why. Why do we want to plant trees in our communities,” Wolf said. “We know that trees are not necessarily popular with everyone.”

One research project she worked on looked at how people perceive business districts based on how much tree coverage was present, not just in front of one business, but in the district as a whole. People were shown pictures of a business street with heavy tree coverage, light tree coverage, all the way to nothing but bare sidewalks.

People were asked to rate which one they prefer and the majority chose tree cover while business owners much preferred the bare sidewalks. Business owners had concerns about trees hiding their business from customers, having to deal with tree debris and even damage from the tree root system.

Wolf said they also gave people a list of common products they would find in a business district and asked people how much they would pay for each while showing a picture of a business street with urban forest coverage and one without.

What they found is that people were willing to pay 9 percent to 12 percent more for the same product in businesses where there was a tree canopy than without. People also had a more positive outlook as to the quality of service and products at the businesses with the urban canopy, she said.

“In terms of visual presence, trees matter,” Wolf said.

Wolf said showed a picture of the main street of Bainbridge Island, Washington, where trees combine with facing benches to create more of a living room type feel. It’s a place meant to encourage lingering in the business district, she said.

In addition, studies are finding that urban forestry has measurable health benefits as well, Wolf said.

One study showed a correlation between reducing low birth weight in children and the proximity of vegetation at the home.

Scientists also studied counties in 15 states that were infected with a common pest. The research was to determine the health of the county while the trees were in place compared to after they had to be cut down. The scientists found an increase in deaths from cardiovascular and respiratory diseases after the trees were cut down, Wolf said. The opposite was found when it came to helping people recover from illnesses. When surgery patients are given a recovery room with a view to nature, researchers have found patients have less pain, fewer minor complications and stay in the hospital for less time, Wolf said.

“Hospitals are now taking this seriously and are building in green spaces to their recovery areas,” Wolf said.
Other studies showed that children who go to schools with a view of trees get better test scores and have a better graduation rate, she said.

“Trees, parks and gardens are essential in our communities. They’re not just nice to have,” Wolf said.

Timber Tax Webinar on Feb. 5 (Thur.) at 2pm Eastern

Presenter: Dr. Linda Wang, National Timber Tax Specialist, US Forest Service

Feb. 5, 2015, Thursday, at 2:00pm Eastern Time (1 CFE)

This free webinar helps woodland owners, foresters and their tax advisors prepare for the filing of their 2014 federal tax returns, including latest tax law changes

http://www.forestrywebinars.net/webinars/timber-tax-update-for-the-2014-tax-year

(No need to pre-register) (First time attendees please log in an hour ahead to download software (5 minutes))

 

 

 

New Extension Publication – Taking Photos of Trees

Taking Photos of Trees for Expert Identification and Urban Forest Inventories

Extension personnel often receive questions regarding the identification of a particular tree.  The current accessibility of digital photography, email, and text messaging provides the easiest means to submitting specimens for identification.

Digital Photography

Take close-up photos of the specimen with a digital camera.  Please consider the following:

  • Select a specimen that shows as many distinguishing characteristics of a species as possible.
  • If there is a dramatic variation in leaf shape on a single plant, include photographs of all leaf shapes.
leaf
  • Unique characteristics are particularly important to include such as thorns, twigs and branching pattern, or fruits/nuts if available.
flower
  • Include a photograph of the bark showing its characteristics.
bark
  • Finally, send a photograph of the tree in the landscape showing its form.
landscape
  • If necessary, crop the photos to reduce their size for easier downloading.
  • When sending your photographs to Extension personnel, include your contact information and any description you would like to provide about the plant, such as its size, history, or habitat.  If you like, you may use the Tree Identification Request Form on the back.   Send photographs via e-mail to your inventory facilitator/coordinator/team leader.

Tree Identification Request Form

  1. 1.       Specimen Description

 Specimen includes leaves:                       twigs:              fruit:                stem:                other:

Plant origin          naturally occurring:                 planted:                       unknown:

Plant size (approx.)          height:             diameter (at breast height):

Form                    single stem:                 multi-stem:

2.       Specialist’s Response     

 Common name:

Scientific name:

Normal range:

Habitat:

Primary uses:

Specialist:

Date: